And they are not really full-range by any means. Maybe used ATC 25A pair likeīut to avoid expensive errors you will have to listen them by yourself. I'm not sure if you will find something much better than O310 under 6K. But it's not easy to guess what is "translate not quite right" without examples. Your question sounds like you need something "different" to overcome inevitable bias of single monitoring pair. Maybe you should ask at GS with more details or even examples what is going wrong with single pair of O310s. But if you have the space and can use these in a midfield orientation, I'm sure the C208 won't disappoint either. I suspect something like the M126Be will give you slightly more top-end refinement in a more compact form. ![]() Some additional EQ in the modal region is of course always necessary and that's no different with this one. Based on the anechoic measurements I've installed one PEQ filter to tame a slight peak (5,7kHz, -1,3dB, Q=2), but other than that there's really nothing to correct which is pretty neat for a passive loudspeaker. Since I use the C208 as a center channel it's arguably the speaker I've listened to both the most in total, and longest in one sitting. Like its siblings the C208 has, as far as I can tell, no issues in this regard. In terms of listening fatigue, all of this stuff more often than not shows up in the anechoic measurements. I've used anything from a DIY amp with Anaview modules (it's what the previous gen Amphion amps used as well) and even an older NAD 2200 (tested here: ). ![]() The Ultima2 series are more difficult to drive I've been told. I can't speak for the Be series although I suspect it's in the same ballpark. Any decent modern power amplifier should do the trick. The Performa3s are the only series I'm personally familiar with (as in own) and they aren't very difficult to drive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |